Muccamukk (
muccamukk) wrote in
heavyartillery2024-03-07 06:44 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Masters of the Air: Episode Discussion 8

NCUTI GATWA! (that is all)
Rules:
- Don't be a dick. Specifically (but not limited to):
- Not liking something is fine, and negative comments are fine. Please do not directly tell other participants why the thing they like is bad or that they are bad for liking it.
- Kink shaming will be deleted.
- Racism, homophobia, transphobia, antisemitism, misogyny, etc will be deleted.
- Discussing material from the books is fine, but if you're going to discuss something that happens in future episodes, or the fate of historical characters, please put it under a cut and title the comment
Book spoilers!
or something similar. - Likewise, wanting to treat the show as a self-contained unit and not engage with the books/history is perfectly valid.
How to do an in-comment spoiler cut:
no subject
I liked the Red Tails, and felt like we got a better intro to at least Alex than we have to most of the mains in the rest of the series. Idk much about the other two. I do feel like... a) apparently white airmen expressed no racist attitudes whatsoever at anytime b) I don't understand why we've sprouted a Red Tails plot in episode 8/9.
Same with Sandra. Happy to watch five seasons and a movie of Bel Powell's spy adventures, but why the hell are they included on this show? The filming of her scenes were great though!
All the Buck Squared things in the camp were good, though I would've liked more about how Egan came around to being productive.
Don't really care about Croz anymore, and not nearly enough Rosie this episode.
no subject
This episode made me want to tear my hair out. I liked getting to see the Tuskegee airmen and I liked the characters introduced, but also their backstory didn't tie into anything. Why not introduce this episodes earlier and have us follow their progression? Also...so we saw Sandra for a moment in France and then...nothing about her mission? Why include?
Crosby's narration drove me crazy. I feel like we could have just seen this episode from Rosie's perspective and from the POW camp and that would have been so much more coherent. Such a frustrating episode for me.
(no subject)
no subject
Alex!! Loved his character, loved how they showed they were getting shit missions and no promotions and they were still damn good pilots. It was exciting to see a bit of their backstory before they joined the Bucks - and the tension in the camp with all of the plotting and planning is intense.
Buck and Bucky and their VERY public spat.... I have many thoughts, none of them coherent.
Still not sure what they're trying to show with Sandra - I couldn't really understand what her handlers were saying to her in France. I just like that she's the one who isn't simping over Harry. For her, her missions always come first and she's always been clear about that. I want more of her though.
HOW are they wrapping all of this up in one more ep??? :(
(no subject)
no subject
--Great seeing the Tuskegee airmen and wish we had gotten an episode about them sooner. The show could have focused more on their own journeys through the war and how that was like for them.
--The camp scenes post-Egan getting his shit together were also fun! I always love scenes of people organizing and readying themselves to fuck shit up so they can be free.
Everything else:
--Couldn't be bothered with Crosby anymore and skipped pretty much all of his scenes.
--D-Day shown through only a glimpse because Crosby was passed out made me SO ANGRY.
--What was the point of giving us Sandra and doing nothing with her spy arc?? I wanted to see her be amazing!
--Not enough Rosie.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
And then they introduced the Tuskegee airmen with one episode left. Can we get an entire show with them they were killing it with the chemistry.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)